Tuesday, May 5, 2009

I just wonder...


If Republicans are such a big stupid target now, why haven't we been laughing for eight years? If wit is such a potent weapon, why didn't anybody shoot them when it mattered? Are Democrats any less pathetic when they're out of power? Do we really believe that mockery will make this part of the American psyche less virulent? Have we learned nothing?

090506: The next day this arrives from AlterNet: "The Far Right's First 100 Days: Getting More Extreme by the Day (Their talk is turning ugly, and it's not unthinkable that we could be in for a wave of domestic terrorism unseen since the mid-'90s.") quote: "They've been humiliated by their election losses. And that's hugely dangerous, because authoritarian leaders react uniquely badly to being humiliated."


It's a Carmen Miranda kind of day.


Oh, hell...

State Sells Two-Thirds of Pharmacies



On Tuesday, the Swedish government officially announced that it is to sell two-thirds of its 900 state-owned pharmacies. By abolishing the state monopoly in this sector, the centre-right government intends to increase competition on the pharmaceutical market – which eventually should lead to lower drug prices. But the opposition fears that abolishing the state monopoly will merely lead to oligopolies by a few private competitors.


Via: SR Engelska

I'm really afraid Swedes don't understand what they've given up here. Speaking as someone who has seen, firsthand, what Big Pharma can do to a medical system, how totally corrupting its influence can be, I worry that Sweden may have put an already shaky health care system into mortal jeopardy. It's not just the Apoteks, but everything connected to them that will become the target of that awful machine. As for the argument that it will lower prices, all one has to do is look to America to see the fallacy in that. Without being condescending, I really wonder if Swedes have any notion of how low their drug costs already are. People go bankrupt in the United States paying for medicine. Is that what we want here?

Vive la différence

Posted by tristero, Hullabaloo at 8:27 PM on May 4, 2009.



Today, I came across the following menu:



Cucumbers with garlic and fine herbs



Basque chicken thigh with herbs



Red and green bell peppers and olive oil



Couscous



Organic yogurt



Apple



In most parts of the US, that would be described as a gourmet, or near-gourmet meal. In France, it's called government-sponsored school lunch.


Via: AlterNet

Saturday, May 2, 2009

Starlight

170493.jpg.jpeg

This is what has been running through my mind all day.
I can't explain it. It just is. ⓗ

Zombies

Capitalism.jpg.jpg

This is probably the best, clearest, summation of the current situation and the functioning of Capitalism I've read: Ecosocialism: For a Society of Good Ancestors (Part One). It's well worth reading, in full.

"If you ask any of them individually, our rulers would undoubtedly say that they want their children and grandchildren to live in a stable and sustainable world. So why do their actions contradict their words? Why do they seem determined, in practice, to leave their children and grandchildren a world of poisoned air and water, a world of floods and droughts and escalating climate disasters? Why have they repeatedly sabotaged international efforts to adopt even half-hearted measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions?



When they do consider or implement responses to the climate crisis, why do they always support solutions that do not work, that cannot possibly work?



Karl Marx had a wonderful phrase for the bosses and their agents — the big shareholders and executives and top managers and the politicians they own — a phrase that explains why they invariably act against the present and future interests of humanity. These people, he said, are “personifications of capital.” Regardless of how they behave at home, or with their children, their social role is that of capital in human form.



They don’t act to stop climate change because the changes needed by the people of this world are directly contrary to the needs of capital.



Capital has no conscience. Capital can’t be anyone’s ancestor because capital has no children. Capital has only one imperative: it has to grow."


(Via Dissident Voice.)


capitalism-bound.jpg.jpg

Friday, May 1, 2009

Damn!

21979549.jpg

My houseboy, Tostado (illegitimate son of Sansi's Taco & Tamale) still hasn't done the dishes! If I don't watch him every minute, he sneaks off to nap, or other mischief.